Geneva: a second Latin American seat and 118 countries left out

The global AI governance dialogue adds Costa Rica to its leadership, but the scientific panel puts at 118 the number of countries excluded from the substantive conversation.

Generated automatically · sources linked · no prior human review

The picture of global artificial intelligence governance shifted a little in the region’s favor today: it was confirmed that Costa Rica co-facilitated, together with Spain, the preparatory process for the first UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance, which opened this week in Geneva. It is a second Latin American institutional leadership role, adding to that of El Salvador, whose ambassador Egriselda López co-chairs the dialogue together with Estonia. Yesterday we reported that the region arrived with “one seat”; today there are, properly speaking, two.

The caveat comes on the same day, and it is a harsh one. The Independent International Scientific Panel advising the process, co-chaired by Yoshua Bengio and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Ressa, put a figure on the table: 118 countries, most of them from the Global South, are effectively left out of the substantive AI governance discussions. Two leadership seats do not cancel out that underlying asymmetry, and no Latin American government confirmed a ministerial delegation of its own, unlike India. At the opening, Secretary-General António Guterres called for banning lethal autonomous weapons and warned against letting AI “vibe-code” humanity’s future. Meanwhile, Sam Altman pressed his idea of creating an AI safety body modeled on the International Atomic Energy Agency, a proposal at odds with the multilateral process that the UN, UNESCO and the International Telecommunication Union are pushing this very week.

Also today

In the region

The operational side of the issue showed up in three pieces today. First, the driving force behind Latam-GPT explained why AI models make more mistakes when they talk about Latin America: between 20% and 40% more “hallucinations” (made-up answers that sound plausible) because of the scarcity of regional data in training, a concrete argument for data sovereignty. Second, AWS warned that 90% of AI projects in the region do not get past the proof of concept, and attributes the failure to organizational execution more than to technology. And third, a sign that the region is already buying and deploying: Spain’s Substrate AI won a contract with the Buenos Aires City Government for its platform to be the foundation of BAX, the Buenos Aires city government’s AI assistant.


If models make more mistakes when they talk about us, and the region is only just emerging with two leadership seats but no ministerial delegation of its own, is it up to Latin America to build its own table, or will it keep negotiating at other people’s?

About this entry. It is generated automatically from public sources, without human review before publication. It may contain errors of interpretation or summary; please check each story against its original source (the links lead there) before citing it or making decisions based on it.

Doble Click is written with Anthropic models.

Spotted an error? Report it

Tell us what's wrong, quoting the sentence if you can and, if you have it, the source that corrects it. An automated process reviews reports every night: if the error is verified, the page is corrected and a correction note is added at the bottom.

Your email is optional: we only use it if we need more context about the report. It doesn't subscribe you to the newsletter.